Busting some myths

There has been a fair amount of discussion about energy policies in the recent past, aided in no small part by the interest generated in the recently concluded U.S. presidential election. Some facts that were thrown about has been taken as received wisdom. We examine some of these here.

1. Oil companies are extracting extra “economic rents” for the high price of gasoline/petrol

There are many factors that resulted in the run up of gasoline price. About 70-75% of the price is that of crude and refining/distribution/service station charges. The government taxes comprises of 10-15% depending on regulatory regimes. At the end of the day, Oil and Gas companies earn about 5-10% as profit.
There are also several additional factors that impact the price at the pump- cost of exploration and development, cost of extraction (the cost of human services as part of this is another story- more on this in another post), refining cost (no new refineries have been commissioned in the US in the past 17 years). I also think that the cost of speculation was a big factor- note the rapid decline in price in the last two months as many margin call positions were liquidated in the oil futures markets.

2. Oil companies are not investing in alternative energies.

The U.S. oil and natural gas industry invested almost $100 billion between 2000 and 2005 in emerging energy technologies, including $12 billion in non-hydrocarbons and $42 billion in greenhouse gas emission mitigation technologies from 2000 to 2006. This is not mere green PR, but real investments.
There have also been some advances in less intrusive technologies for exploration and production. However, the industry has successfully developed breakthrough technologies like 4D seismic imaging and multi-directional drilling, which have helped reduce the industry’s environmental footprint dramatically. Today it is possible to develop nearly 80 square miles of area below the surface from a single two-acre site on the surface.